Linguistic and content analysis of The Landlady by Roald Dahl.
The Landlady by Roald Dahl is one of his most intriguing pieces This is because it both contains and contradicts many stereotypes regarding men and women during that time period. Most interesting, however, is the fact that Todorov’s narrative theory does not apply in this case. Albeit, it starts off fairly normally and calm, with a young and confident man by the name of Billy looking for a place to stay as he’s been assigned to a new office, however, things slowly take a turn for the worst. The first stereotype we encounter is, in fact, the title. The term “Landlady” alone is enough to come across as sexist and discriminative . For one, she has been objectified, ripped of her human status and is referred to as “The landlady.” The job its self is further stereotypical – A woman who served and entertained her guests by doing all domestic chores and jobs to please the guest – A male in this case. However it can also be interpreted as giving the female the leading role; she is the centre of the story.
More minor stereotypes are used regarding Billy: He often refers to pubs and comparisons between that and a Bed and Breakfast, typical associations with masculinity. He himself appears to be quite sexist and stereotypical when he is musing about the potential Landlady – He imagines a rapacious woman, meaning aggressively greedy or grasping, with a fairly dark view of the house its self.
What follows is a series of stereotypes and contradictions surrounding the landlady in question – She appears almost instantly at the door when Billy presses the doorbell, and like a good host, is there to welcome him in. She is described as a fairly old woman in her forties or fifties who has a “warm smile” and invites Billy in “pleasantly”. There are further descriptions of having a round pink face and gentle blue eyes, both of which are commonly used to describe an ideal woman. Gentle, referring to her frailty and general weakness in both body and mind, and pink face, a colour commonly associated with femininity.
She appears to be the perfect host, courteous and helpful – The landlady even goes as far to lower the price for Billy. It’s quite clear she wants him in this house, for some reason, which could explain how a room was ready for him despite his only recent appearance. Billy is unknowing, of course. He refers to her as “The mother of ones best school friend welcoming one into the house to stay for the Christmas holidays.” which could show his already growing trust of her.
Almost instantly, once Billy is too far in to go back without being rude -and therefore not a gentlemen- the woman’s attitude changes slightly. She instantly becomes more sexualized, her words having various undertones and innuendos attached. She uses phrases like “We have it all to ourselves” and “Pleasure” which can both be interpreted as suggestive phrases. Then, a phrase that is often overlooked, is “taking a visitor into my little nest.” This phrase in particular seems to have heavy foreshadowing, primarily because no one goes into a bird’s nest and comes out alive other than the birds themselves. Usually, a mother bird will fly for prey and bring it back to the nest so that the younger birds may eat.
The fact that the landlady seems intent on getting Billy to stay is further emphasized by her thorough description of the house to make it more appealing and flattering Billy by referring to how she was picky with her visitors. This implies he fits her criteria, which becomes clearer later.
The Landlady’s actions only get stranger from here on – She openly admires and analyses Billy’s form, almost in a predatory fashion. This can either be interpreted as sexual or even malicious.
Shortly after leading Billy to his lodgings, she leaves fairly quickly to the kitchen to prepare dinner. Whether it’s because she is the hostess or because it was a woman’s job to do the domestic chores for a man, it’s unclear. What is clear, however, is that there is something wrong with the landlady. Her general sexual attitude and attempts at persuading Billy to stay are not typical of a hostess, and when Billy goes to sign the ledger, he finds only two names written on the same page as his. Both, sound familiar.
When Billy and his landlady (Note the use of “His”.) are discussing the familiarity of the two names, it is revealed that both men were young and handsome, just like Billy. Almost as if she has a type of guest that she prefers.
The drinking of the tea is the most intriguing part; Billy describes it as pickled walnuts, new leather, and the corridors of a hospital. These are extremely unusual and overall fairly unappealing when describing tea but they are of extreme importance in regards to foreshadowing later events in the story. They are not typical flavours one expects to taste in tea- Corridors in a hospital is the most intriguing one. Hospitals are related to sickness, ill health, bad luck and overall, death. Billy tastes death.
This is purely interpretation, of course. But considering the strange circumstances, and the fact that shortly after consuming the drink, the Landlady says something rather ominous, in regards to Mr. Mulholland, one of her two guests. Billy inquiries as to whether he recently left and the landlady replies with “Left?” She said, arching her eyebrows. “But my dear boy, he never left. He’s still here, Mr. Temple is also here. They’re on the third floor, both of them together.”
Considering the last signature on the ledger was two years ago, it’s highly unlikely that both young boys with an education and a future decided to stay in the boarding house for two years.
As Billy grows uneasy, the landlady becomes even more outgoing in her strange actions. She pats him on the knee – A very sexual action that to Billy is probably not at all comforting. She inquires about his age, and releases the information that Mr. Mulholland was also that age, reinforcing the idea that she has a preferred type of male guest.
When moving on to discuss Mr. Temple, she reveals once more that there was not a blemish on his body – Has the landlady seen Mr. Temples entire body? Enough of such to be able to get such information? I doubt a young man would allow an older woman to examine his body without necessary need to do so in the first place.
The conversation topic changes, but it doesn’t get any more pleasant. If anything, things take a darker and more twisted turn as Billy asks about the dead parrot, whom the landlady stuffed herself. The same went for the dog who is exposed in the open on the carpet, completely preserved. Although Billy calls the overall scene “fascinating” this is where my interpretations are solidified. The landlady shows no sadness or shock at having to stuff her own pets who may or may not have been close to her, as if it were a normal act.
The landlady goes on to ask Billy whether he wants another cup of tea, and this is where my assumptions are solidified. The tea apparently smells like bitter almonds – The smell of Cyanide. There has been a large amount of evidence mounting up since the landlady’s introduction as to her actions, but it is quite clear now what was happened.
There is a quote from a book series called A Song of Fire and Ice: “Poison is a woman’s weapon.” There is a large amount of suspicion – From hearing about Mr. Temple and Mr. Mulholland in the newspaper, perhaps their being missing, and them still being upstairs, to the landlady stuffing her dogs to preserve them and possess them infinitely, it seems that the landlady, who is never named throughout the tale, is a murderer, a stark change to the usual. Generally its men who have a higher crime rate, but in this case the landlady has turned that stereotype on its head. The term I would use for this would be “Femme Fatal” meaning an attractive and seductive woman, especially one who will ultimately cause distress to a man who becomes involved with her.
But I digress. We are discussing the language used to portray this and the stereotypes involved.
To conclude, this story is a huge change from what we originally expected, another reason as to why it does not fit Todorov’s narrative theory. In this case, it is the man whom is the helpless victim, and the sexual façade the landlady uses is a fake to hide her true motives and true identity. This is emphasized by the fact that not only is she only referred to as a nameless landlady, but also by the fact that Billy’s primary focus is her appearance and apparent lack of sanity. The fact that this was written in 1959 is surprising, as I did not expect such diversity and openness regarding this topic in particular; it is surprisingly deep analytical of typical stereotpyes regarding men and women during that time period and carefully builds upon them to create the thrilling effect that makes this story a short horror.